What is Shareholder Oppression?

Disputes between the shareholders of companies of all sizes are common although it is particularly common in smaller private companies with multiple shareholders. Basically, the idea of shareholder oppression is that the dominant shareholder or shareholders are acting in a manner that is oppressive to the interests of the minority shareholders. This may manifest itself through the denial of directorships or other management positions in the company. It may be because the company fails to allocate dividends fairly or organises a company buy back of shares in a manner that disregards the interests of the minority shareholders. Shareholder oppression suits can exist in relation to public companies as well although these dealings are on a much larger scale than what is normally seen in smaller private companies.

In common law countries, there is an extensive body of case law which deals with the concept of shareholder oppression. However, the action in its most basic form is derived from the Part 2F.1 of the Corporations Act 2001(Cth). Sections 232 and 234 of the legislation allow shareholders to make oppression applications or former shareholders or even persons determined by ASIC to be entitled to do so. If an application is made, the courts must find that the conduct of a companies affairs is oppressive by reason of it being contrary to the interests of the shareholders as a whole or oppressive, prejudicial or unfairly discriminatory against a shareholder or group of shareholders. The term company’s affairs is defined very broadly and basically refers to anything which involves the management and operation of the company and its affairs. Oppression could involve the diversion of corporate opportunities, excessive renumeration, manipulation of share issues, withholding information, boardroom tactics or misappropriation of company funds.

The courts have a broad discretion to deal with such activity. Courts may order that a company be wound up, one shareholder purchase the shares of another shareholder or that a receiver be appointed. It is not uncommon for shareholders to seek recompense from a company in which they own share where their interests have been overlooked by the management of the company. If you need to know more about shareholder oppression suits, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Do Mediation and Arbitration Work?

There is a perception that because of the unenforceable nature of mediation as a method of dispute resolution it is doomed to failure. However there is significant empirical evidence that indicates that mediation is a very effective method of dispute resolution. Across a wide of jurisdictions, in family law cases research indicates that mediation is effective in between 50% and 85% of cases with participants satisfied as to the procedure and outcomes involved.

In the context of family law, mediation is seen to be particularly effective because of the way in which mediation promotes the self-determination of the parties in a context where the discussions are confidential. It also has the marked advantage of giving the parties to the dispute the sense of being listened to in a way which simply cannot be achieved through formal litigation.

In relation to matters outside the realm of family law, mediation remains an effective dispute resolution mechanism although perhaps not at the same levels as is the case in family law. However, participants recognise the same advantages as in the case of family law participants. Parties recognise that mediators listen to the parties concerns and give them the opportunity to voice their concerns in front of a third independent party. Participants in the mediation process also report a greater sense of control over the mediation process than they have in relation to other types of dispute resolution, particularly, litigation which tends to be dominated by the procedural emphasis of courts.

Another type of dispute settlement is known as arbitration. Arbitrators decisions are binding on parties but are not arrived at using the same formal rules of evidence as in courts. In smaller civil claims jurisdictions, arbitration has a very good track record in terms of achieving dispute settlement when compared with traditional litigation. Research conducted on the claims records of the District Court in New South Wales, Australia clearly indicates this. Overall, the research indicates that mediation and arbitration are extremely effective methods of dispute resolution which achieve this outcomes by reducing average settlement times and increasing settlement rates whilst achieving the a substantially reduced caseload for the traditional court system. Many of the jurisdictions inundated by their case loads such as the family law jurisdiction and increasingly the estates jurisdiction are utilising mediation and arbitration as effective family law and estate litigation disputes settlement procedures, respectively.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Reviewing and Drafting Shareholder’s Agreements

If you are investing in a business or considering the formation of a new business there is a lot to consider. Aside from deciding what business structure your business or investment in a business is to have, one of the most important things to consider is a shareholder’s agreement. A shareholder’s agreement is a contract between the shareholders of a company which sets out their rights and obligations in relation to each other and the company. It would be helpful to consult an expert in corporate law to have better understanding about shareholder’s agreement and forming a business.

It gives the investors certainty on a number of issues like the appointment of directors and their terms of engagement, share buy back and/or ‘drag along’ or ‘tag along’ provisions. Other issues which might be addressed include insurance for directors, the terms on which new subscriptions of shares can be made, the quorum for board meetings, the payment of dividends, the sale of shares, how loan accounts with the company are to operate, confidentiality issues and the jurisdiction of law in which the company is to operate.

You will also often need to look at the company constitution in order to verify that there is not a conflict with the constitution of the company. Many companies have simply adopted the replaceable rules of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) but others haven’t and in the case where the constitution is non-standard it is necessary to review both the shareholder’s agreement(s) and the company constitution to adequately understand what the rights and obligations of shareholders are in relation to the company and the other shareholders.

We have fixed fee shareholder agreements available which we can draft for you when you are in the process of setting up a business or if you need to amend a shareholder agreement can assist with the process of drafting a deed of amendment to a shareholder agreement. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like more information about shareholder agreements.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

The Sobering Reality of Drunk Driving: Legal Implications and Consequences

Drunk driving remains a grave and preventable issue that poses significant risks to public safety. Every year, countless lives are lost or forever altered due to the devastating consequences of this reckless behavior. As we strive to create safer roads and communities, it is essential to understand the legal implications of drunk driving and the severe penalties that offenders may face. In this blog, we will explore the legal ramifications of driving under the influence (DUI) and the importance of making responsible choices to protect ourselves and others.

Understanding DUI Laws:
Driving under the influence is a serious offense that is heavily penalized by the law in most countries. DUI laws vary from state to state and country to country, but they typically encompass driving while impaired by alcohol or drugs, including prescription medications. These laws are put in place to protect the public and deter individuals from getting behind the wheel when they are impaired.

Consequences of Drunk Driving:
The consequences of drunk driving can be severe and far-reaching. In addition to putting oneself at risk, impaired drivers endanger the lives of passengers, pedestrians, and other motorists. Common legal implications of DUI convictions include hefty fines, suspension or revocation of driver’s licenses, mandatory participation in alcohol education programs, probation, and even jail time. Moreover, a DUI conviction can leave a lasting mark on one’s criminal record, affecting employment opportunities and personal reputation.

Seeking Legal Counsel:
If arrested for drunk driving, it is crucial to seek legal counsel immediately. A criminal law attorney or dui defense lawyer can assess the case, explore possible defenses, and advocate for the best possible outcome. In some instances, a criminal defense lawyer may be able to negotiate reduced charges or explore alternatives to jail time, such as diversion programs or community service. For individuals facing DUI charges in Perth, consulting a reputable criminal law firm perth early on is essential to ensure the protection of their rights and the pursuit of a favorable outcome. By enlisting the services of a skilled attorney, individuals facing DUI charges can increase their chances of securing a positive resolution and moving forward with their lives.

Prevention and Responsibility:
The best way to avoid the legal implications of drunk driving is, of course, to never get behind the wheel while intoxicated. Instead, opt for designated drivers, public transportation, rideshare services, or staying overnight at a friend’s place if necessary. Promoting responsible alcohol consumption and supporting a culture of safety within our communities can help reduce the incidence of drunk driving and save lives.

Conclusion:
Driving under the influence is not only a criminal offense but also a choice that can lead to tragic consequences. By understanding the legal implications of drunk driving and making responsible choices, we can protect ourselves and others from harm. Let us all work together to build safer roads and communities by promoting responsible alcohol consumption and discouraging anyone from driving under the influence. Remember, the choice to not drink and drive is a choice to protect lives and uphold the law.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

International Surrogacy Agreements

Assisted Reproductive Technologies are becoming more and more common treatments. It extends the ability of human beings to create families in later life and where medical issues prevent a traditional pregnancy. Surrogacy is the result of a medical procedure which can take three different forms. Full surrogacy (also known as Host or Gestational) involves the implantation of an embryo created using either:

– the eggs and sperm of the intended parents
– a donated egg fertilised with sperm from the intended father
– an embryo created using donor eggs and sperm.

Partial surrogacy (also known Straight or Traditional) – Partial surrogacy involves sperm from the intended father and an egg from the surrogate. Here fertilisation is (usually) done by artificial insemination or intrauterine insemination (IUI).

There can be a variety of medical reasons and conditions that create the need for a surrogacy arrangement but in legal terms, the upshot is that surrogacy is a sensitive area which must be handled carefully to avoid implications for the genetic parents, birth parents and the children concerned. In New South Wales and most states around Australia, commercial surrogacy is illegal meaning that any person in these states must not engage in a commercial surrogacy arrangement. However, altruistic surrogacy arrangements are legal although there are a series of requirements that include:

(1) The surrogacy arrangement be in writing;
(2) Each of the parties obtain independent legal advice on the terms of the arrangement;
(3) The surrogate must be over 25 years old at the time of making the agreement;
(4) Each of the affected parties must have received counselling from a qualified counsellor about the surrogacy arrangement and its social and psychological implications before entering into the surrogacy arrangement.
(5) The birth mother and the birth mother’s partner (if any) must have received further counselling from a qualified counsellor about the surrogacy arrangement and its social and psychological implications after the birth of the child and before consenting to the parentage order.

International surrogacy is an area involving a whole new level of complexity. If an expatriate goes overseas and adopts a child according to the laws of a foreign country, that adoption will generally not be recognised in Australia. It can only be recognised where it conforms to the requirements of the International Convention on Intercountry Adoption which Australia is a signatory to.

Immigration requirements must also be considered for international surrogacy arrangements. Lincoln Goldfinch Law is a reputable immigration law firm you can reach out to for guidance and assistance. Unless a biological link with a citizen can be proven by DNA test, the child will need to pass the necessary immigration requirements to enter without the benefit of citizenship by descent which is available to children where it can be proven that a child has been born to a citizen. This makes it very rare for children born to an international surrogacy agreement without a biological link to an citizen to be eligible for entry  on a permanent basis or for them to become a citizen by descent. As for those entering the country on the basis of employment, there are legal experts that can assist in acquiring an h1b visa in order to do so legally. Contact migration agent in perth your trusted visa experts.

If you have a question about international surrogacy arrangements, we are more than happy to help. Please do not hesitate to contact us.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Sydney Conveyancing Tipped to See Record Prices

In 2010, Australia experienced one of the strongest housing markets in the world during 2010, new research shows.  However, in 2011 it is not certain that this trend will continue.  It is likely that rising interest rates will retard the rapid growth in the market according to the Global Real Estate Trends report.  Home prices increased in Australia, Canada, France, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom over the time that the research was being conducted.  They remained flat in Germany and the United States, and fell in Ireland, Italy, Japan and Spain.

Australia led the pack in house price growth, thanks to relatively-low unemployment and tight housing supply.  However, interest rate hikes and a cut to the first homeowners grant slowed a “red-hot” property market in 2010 to some degree, the report said.  It is predicted that the RBA will raise interest rates by an additional 75 basis points in 2011 which will add to this slowing effect.  The dark horse of the global property market was the United States, where there was a surprise result and the housing market stabilised.  The United States has much lower interest rates than Australia.  That trend is expected to continue, with the report predicting the US Federal Reserve to maintain its record-low 0.25 per cent rate through the end of 2011.

This means that property transactions will be likely to be seeing continued growth, especially in the big cities in Australia where property price growth has simply been a fact of life for more than two decades now.  The asset inflation in property and the unaffordability of housing is one of the most difficult problems, but also on of the greatest sources of wealth in the Australian housing market.  Conveyancers are not predicting any reduction in the number of transactions either with the the relative liquity of the property markets expected to remain at their present levels.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Sydney Lawyers plan Class Action over Wrongful Arrests

The state government is facing a very large compensation bill due to a computer glitch which led to the arrest and detention of a number of people, including minors.  It is understood that the arrests were the result of systemic problem with the police database system which tended to cast suspicion over people by falsely attributing information to them indicating prior criminal activity.  Last year, the NSW Police paid more than $2.7 million to 22 people, including five juveniles, after officers made unlawful arrests wrongly alleging bail condition breaches and having the right to hire a bail bondsman. Thankfully, these juveniles along with their families were able to work with an experienced bail bondsman like this Payment Plans Bail Bonds Service to cover these costs without too severe an effect on their financials and livelihood. The police computer system did not contain accurate information, the government has revealed in parliamentary papers.

An issue is that there seems to be a pattern of bureaucratic buck passing where the police blame the Attorney General’s Department and this department blames the police.   It creates a ridiculous waste of public time and money and perpetuates what is in fact a grave injustice which measured against international human rights standards.  The pattern which has occurred in the cases heard before the courts so far is that when the person accused is brought to court, the court has more accurate records than the police and the police are forced to apologize, which is embarrassing and expensive in terms of compensation and lost police time.

The 22 matters already settled or resulting in court orders for compensation averaged a payout of $124,000 each. They involved some related claims of false imprisonment, assault and malicious prosecution, the government told the Greens MP David Shoebridge in a budget estimates meeting.  There have been more payouts of as much as $200,000 this financial year.  Its legal team has found 10 more people aged 13 to 19 alleging wrongful arrest who may join the litigation.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Vodafone likely to face class action

Furious customers of the telco giant Vodafone are preparing to sue the company in a class action over the poor performance of the company network.  Customers calling its customer care line have been placed on hold for hours on end and then forced to fill out long, laborious forms.  Some customers who complained the loudest and contacted the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) have been able to get out of their contracts and received compensation but others have given up long before this stage.  The major complaints about the telco relate to calls dropping out, reception issues and poor data performance which has led to an argument being raised that the original contracts which customers entered into taking on the character of being misleading and misrepresentative, exposing the company to a number of claims against the revenue it has drawn for its services accross the lack lustre network.

Many Vodafone customers have said the constant call dropouts and reception issues have meant they have been unable to properly operate their businesses. Others have said they have been unable to call family after being involved in an accident.  The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) recently chastised the telco for failing to inform customers of its issues and Vodafone CEO Nigel Dews published an apology on Vodafone’s website.  On the prospect of a class action, Dews said in a statement that the most important thing the telco could do was to focus on improving its network and customer experience.  Despite the immense issues faced by its existing customers, Vodafone continues to spend millions on advertising for new customers, including as a primary sponsor of the cricket.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Parliament prorogued by Governor in unprecedented move by Keneally

In a move that has taken the state by shock, the state government has, at the behest of the Premier Kristina Kenally, officially closed the formal business of parliament.  The move is one of the most blatant political manipulations of the parliamentry process which the state has witnessed in quite some time.  The political reason for the move is that it ensures that the Opposition will be blocked from holding its inquiry into the electricity sale which was due to begin today.  There are serious questions over whether this is consitutional under our present legal system because of the system of government implied under the rule of law in the Australian Constitution which has been interepreted as applying to the states as well.

In a statement released by the Premier’s office this morning, Kristina Keneally said the NSW Governor, Marie Bashir, had prorogued the parliament, effective immediately.  Parliamentry committees cannot hold hearings before the March election, including the planned upper house inquiry into the government’s controversial $5.3 billion sale of the state’s electricity assets.  The strategy is clearly an attempt to muzzle the government’s critics on a number of issues, but most likely the electricity sell off.  The Opposition had planned to reveal the details of the inquiry today, including the proposed terms of reference and the expected start date, which could have been as early as January 10.  The inquiry had the support of the Greens and the Christian Democrat MP Fred Nile which meant the inquiry could have started as soon the procedural issues had been resolved.  Parliament was not expected to be prorogued until late February, according to the official calendar on the NSW Parliament’s website.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Exit Fees and Refinancing

One of the major barriers to refinancing to a better loan is the fact that there are now moves to abolish the punishing exit fees which prevent people from switching to a better deal on a home loan.  In the new package announced by the government desinged to control the big four bank monopoly,  Treasurer Wayne Swan at the weekend that borrowers who take out a home loan from July next year will be spared an early exit fee.

The new legislation, to be introduced in 2011, would see lenders prosecuted if they tried attempt to re-introduce exit fees under another title.  As it stands, the Commonwealth and Westpac banks charge a $700 and $900 exit fee respectively.   ANZ has also offered some sweeteners.  It says it will abolish its deferred establishment fee, more commonly termed an exit fee, as well as dropping fees for customers switching to a special three-year fixed loan it is offering.  ANZ is cutting its three-year fixed home loan rate by 44 basis points to 7.1 per cent per annum until the end of the year.

ANZ says there will not be any more increases in the bank’s interest rates for now.  “Obviously we will continue to keep a close watch on funding costs. Certainly I hope there isn’t any further move because I do appreciate that this is very stressful on many of our customers,” he said.

This reform will make it much simplier and cheaper to exit a home loan and change to a provider who can offer a better deal, increasing the overall competitiveness of the banking sector as they are forced to match each other’s prices when customer’s fly to to the cheaper loans or the loans that provide a better service.  If you are interested in refinancing, a solicitor can assist you with the transfer of the loan by discharging the mortgage and creating the new mortgage with the bank.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail